Determining whether federal workers are overpaid or underpaid is becoming a cottage industry. There are people on both sides who, using different charts, graphs, measurements, data and assumptions, can prove it either way. As yesterday’s column noted, one group can prove that feds earn 58 percent more than private-sector workers. Another has proof that feds are underpaid an average of 28 percent.
I hope neither side had a hand in building the Metro subway tunnel that runs under the Potomac River.
The problem of overpaid vs. underpaid feds is two-fold. First, it depends on whose rules and whose ruler is used. And it depends, a lot, on preconceived notions. A “conservative” think tank and a “progressive” union have very different ideas of what constitutes a level playing field.
Since the experts will never agree, or even come close, forget about them. How do feds (and nonfeds who know them) feel about the great pay debate? Check these out:
“When are people going to stop wasting money doing these comparisons? I guess they will stop when politicians want to stop making federal employees the scapegoat for their impotence. Working for the federal government or the private sector is still a choice I believe? For those who complain that they do not make enough in the private sector, why didn’t they choose to work for the fed? That is because, when you start at the fed, you don’t make enough money for food and rent at the same time, and you usually need a second job. It is not until years later that you make what could be called a living wage. Most of the people they are comparing to the private sector have been with the fed for 25 years, and they are being compared to what most make in the private sector after only a few years.
“If you want instant money, big bucks, a great car and house right away, choose the private sector. If you want a modest living for years and years and somewhat of a retirement, choose the fed. The bottom line is choice. Politicians and think tanks who are paid for nothing are the only ones that care and they incite the public into a lather to keep their eyes off of the real screwing they are giving them behind closed doors. If you are working for the fed and whining all day, go to the private sector and take your chance with job security. If you are in the private sector and whining about how much those feds make, then come on down, we have a nice grade 5 position for you and you can make what you used to make in the private sector in about 20 years. You still have a right to choose.” —Signed, Under the Bus
” My brother, who works for the federal government here in St. Louis, showed me your column about the public vs. private pay debate. We are close in age. Both have bachelor’s in the same field. For a time, we had similar jobs. I made slightly more than he did, partially because of his deductions which were higher than mine.
“We each have 401(k) plans. He gets a total 5 percent match from his employer, the federal government. I get nothing. He gets more vacation time than I do. And more holidays. One difference people never point out is job security. I haven’t heard of any big federal government layoffs or furloughs. I was furloughed, then laid off. It seems to me that federal workers take their benefits for granted and focus entirely on the pay packet. Trust me, job security is no big deal as long as you have a job. When you get laid off it is all important.” — Tim in St. Louis
“Enjoyed the column on the pay gap. How about a specific example? When I was a GS-0301-14 Program Manager in 2007, I was paid roughly $97K per year. My private-sector “Program Manager” counterpart, who worked for a predecessor of Accenture (Bearing Point), was paid roughly $250K per year.
“Was there a difference? A significant one; however, when the team brought the program to Full Operational Capability, I moved to another job (albeit with a downgrade). I believe my private-sector counterpart continued to work at Bearing Point, he very well could have been laid off at the conclusion of the specific contract. And therein lies the difference.
“As they say, life is about choices, and any government worker who wants more pay is certainly free to work in the private sector, and any private-sector employee who wants more job security is certainly free to apply for any open government position.
If you use this example, please do not use my name. Although I am no longer with the organization I was with in 2007, I don’t like my name ‘out there.'” — D in Defense
The color of cheese naturally appears in a range from solid white to “buttery yellow,” according to Slate — but never orange. English farmers first began dying cheese orange in the 16th century to make it appear higher in fat and thus garner a higher price. Commercial U.S. cheese producers began dying cheese “to address the problem of inconsistent cheese color due to seasonal variations.”
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Sequestration could spur furloughs at Education For the first time, Congress examined the impact across-the-board spending cuts would have on civilian agencies including furloughs and reduced contracting within the Education Department.
Fear hinders hiring people with disabilities Fear is one of the biggest barriers to the federal government hiring more people with disabilities. That fear comes from managers not knowing how a person with disabilities can do their job – even if they are qualified, said Kathy Martinez, assistant secretary of Labor for the Office of Disability Employment Policy.
VIDEO: Blind NIH employees form own resource-sharing group Teresa Shea took off at a brisk pace through the Bethesda, Md., office park of her job with the National Institutes of Health, her white cane lightly tapping the sidewalk. When she first learned how to walk with a cane, Shea said she tried moving slowly but ended up walking in a crooked line. Walking at her normal speed, Shea said she stays on a straight path.