The Supreme Court on Monday loosened the limits on the kinds of inventions that are eligible for patent protection in a case that was closely watched for its impacts on innovation, the Washington Post reports.
At issue was a bid by two inventors to patent a business method for hedging risk in buying energy. The high court unanimously rejected the inventors’ claim, deeming their innovation too abstract to qualify for patent protection. But in doing so, it also rejected a lower court’s reasoning that only inventions involving machinery or physical “transformations” are eligible for patents.
Some experts hailed the decision as a move that could bring patent law out of the industrial era, when inventions were more likely to be machines, into the information age, where they are often are less tangible.
These stories are part of our daily Dorobek Must Reads. Check out the full list of stories.