Dr. David Paschane, an organizational architect with Aplin Partners, offers advice for how Senior Executive Service members can prepare for new political appoin...
If you are among the 8,000 government employees who are in the Senior Executive Service (SES), then you may want to consider these five key actions as the new administration gets going:
Define operations
You can’t answer tough questions unless you are prepared. Get prepared by defining each operation as a team that produces a key line of outputs that causes an unambiguous outcome. Specify who leads that team. Define the operation’s specific team members (employees, contractors, cross-organizational staff), the operational expenses and any contracts plus their costs.
Define risks
If you have an opportunity to make changes, plan on changing risk factors. List risks in your larger organizational-oversight context, the structure of your operations (workforce, communications, rules), the management design and the self-analyzing and self-improving capability (or lack of) in your culture. Knowing risk factors always gives you a position for recommending smart, targeted changes.
Define analyses
You may not have the best analyses, but you need to know what you will analyze if you have the chance, and why it would be useful. Logically, unadulterated data from the lowest level of operations is most valuable, especially if you can analyze it in terms of what factors cause which effects. In most cases, the means, scope and targeting of analyses are underdeveloped, but this is understandable, as conditions change (see risks).
Examples matter in every management discussion, and more so when you are the executive. You will need to define what a case of work looks like in your operations, and then provide examples of cases that illustrate risks, workflows and management that need analyses. These example cases are necessary for justifying a larger, organizational case for improving an operation’s capability to perform better or increase its value as an outcome.
Define rigor
As the executive, everyone is looking to you to set the bar for how rigorous you want your organization to be when it comes to tackling risks and organizing analyses. Rigor gets to the question of your willingness to routinely assess the cause-effects in operations, and make decisions about its changes. Reorganizing a process, making a performance dashboard, or training staff is not rigor, per se, as these can reinforce the status quo. Your rigor defines how thorough you and your staff will be in creating a better operation.
Good luck!
Dr. David Paschane is an organizational architect, specializing in increasing the value produced by large bureaucracies. He can be reached at David.Paschane@AplinPartners.com.
5 necessary actions by SESers
Dr. David Paschane, an organizational architect with Aplin Partners, offers advice for how Senior Executive Service members can prepare for new political appoin...
This column originally was posted on LinkedIn.
If you are among the 8,000 government employees who are in the Senior Executive Service (SES), then you may want to consider these five key actions as the new administration gets going:
Define operations
You can’t answer tough questions unless you are prepared. Get prepared by defining each operation as a team that produces a key line of outputs that causes an unambiguous outcome. Specify who leads that team. Define the operation’s specific team members (employees, contractors, cross-organizational staff), the operational expenses and any contracts plus their costs.
Define risks
If you have an opportunity to make changes, plan on changing risk factors. List risks in your larger organizational-oversight context, the structure of your operations (workforce, communications, rules), the management design and the self-analyzing and self-improving capability (or lack of) in your culture. Knowing risk factors always gives you a position for recommending smart, targeted changes.
Define analyses
You may not have the best analyses, but you need to know what you will analyze if you have the chance, and why it would be useful. Logically, unadulterated data from the lowest level of operations is most valuable, especially if you can analyze it in terms of what factors cause which effects. In most cases, the means, scope and targeting of analyses are underdeveloped, but this is understandable, as conditions change (see risks).
Join WTOP the week of Apr. 22 for an exclusive series bringing together government and industry experts to share initiatives and insights about efforts to transform the nation's energy infrastructure. | Register today!
Define cases
Examples matter in every management discussion, and more so when you are the executive. You will need to define what a case of work looks like in your operations, and then provide examples of cases that illustrate risks, workflows and management that need analyses. These example cases are necessary for justifying a larger, organizational case for improving an operation’s capability to perform better or increase its value as an outcome.
Define rigor
As the executive, everyone is looking to you to set the bar for how rigorous you want your organization to be when it comes to tackling risks and organizing analyses. Rigor gets to the question of your willingness to routinely assess the cause-effects in operations, and make decisions about its changes. Reorganizing a process, making a performance dashboard, or training staff is not rigor, per se, as these can reinforce the status quo. Your rigor defines how thorough you and your staff will be in creating a better operation.
Good luck!
Dr. David Paschane is an organizational architect, specializing in increasing the value produced by large bureaucracies. He can be reached at David.Paschane@AplinPartners.com.
Copyright © 2024 Federal News Network. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Related Stories
SES modernization plan should include risks, on and off ramps, roles for millennials
How the Trump administration can improve its relationship with federal employees