Does it pay to work?

After two years of living off no-cal COLAs, federal retirees are going to get a 3.6 percent increase in January. The COLA will also go to survivor annuitants, military retirees and people who get Social Security benefits. It will be the first inflation-catchup the retirees have had since they got a 5.8 percent raise in 2009.

For how that COLA will work, click here.

It is a different story for people who are still working. When January rolls around, federal workers will enter their second year of a pay freeze. And Congress is talking about extending that freeze at least another year — maybe for another three years.

With all of the above in mind some people, who are at or close to retirement, are doing the math and wondering if they are working for little or nothing. With the number of agencies offering buyouts and early retirement on the increase, the numbers get even more interesting. Lots of you have contacted us to say that if the boss offers you a buyout, you are out of there. Gone. Departed. Retired.


Several readers say that if they retired — and deductions for things like the TSP and their CSRS or FERS contributions ended — they would be fine financially. A couple of retirees say that when the costs of commuting and maintaining a work-life wardrobe disappear, they are ahead of the game. Maybe not as stylish, but certainly happier.

Which brings us to this interesting question/computation from an Internal Revenue Service employee. Being severely math-challenged I don’t have a clue if she is right or wrong. But somebody out there probably does. Here’s her comment, then we’d love to hear from you:

“I was thinking (which scares those who know me best) and I have to check with you to see if what I am thinking is right.

With the current pay freeze heading into year two, we are receiving the same pay we were as of January 2010. If the pay freeze continues, we will not see another COLA increase until January 2013 at the earliest, maybe longer.

(For) January 2011, no one received a COLA increase, January 2012 retirees will receive a COLA of 3.6 percent.

If someone were to have retired between January 2010 and December 2011, (say 30 years service GS 12 step 10) they will receive their high 3 benefit originally calculated plus 3.5%. Say they were receiving $2500 a month they would start receiving $2587 per month. BUT if someone who were at the same grade etc. who would have qualified for the same $2500 a month did not retire until sometime in 2012, (say this person is in the same grade/step etc as the person who retired previously), they would only receive the $2500 per month. Of course if they had more time there could be an adjustment for additional years of service, but you get the idea of what I am thinking.

So unless someone is hanging around hoping they work for an agency offering a buyout, which may or may not happen. Or just really can’t find any other way to occupy their time other than put in another few for Uncle Sam, financially they may be better of retiring now as far as long term retirement income goes.

Just a crazy thought, but I would like to know if it is anywhere near accurate.”


By Jack Moore

The official border between Belgium and the Netherlands runs through houses, restaurants and yards, mental_floss writes. When the Netherlands passed laws requiring restaurants to close earlier than those in Belgium, it led to an “absurd, nightly charade” where patrons had to scoot across to the still-open Belgian side.


Cuts to federal pay may hurt public services, CBO warns supercommittee
Doug Elmendorf offered this warning during a rare public hearing of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which is supposed to unveil its deficit-cutting plan by Nov. 23.

OPM: USAJobs glitches stabilized
When the revamped version of the site first launched earlier this month, a larger-than-expected number of visitors slowed the site to a virtual crawl for some users. Just last week, OPM said USAJobs was still inaccessible to about 6 percent of visitors.