As the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee gets back to work with new leadership, lawmakers Wednesday will consider a variety of bills that could have an impact on the federal workforce.
It’s the first business meeting with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) as the committee’s chairman. Gowdy took the committee gavel from Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who left his term early to begin a career in the private sector.
The committee will consider several new pieces of legislation, much of which would affect federal employees’ retirement and would expand the authority agencies have to give their workers cash bonuses for certain cost-saving disclosures.
Here are six bills to watch this summer. The oversight committee will consider five of them at a business meeting Wednesday.
Less than a month after House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Government Operations Subcommittee Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) introduced the bill, the TSP Modernization Act is getting a markup in the full committee.
Cummings and Meadows introduced the bill last month. Sens. Tom Carper (D-Del.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) first introduced the legislation in the Senate in April.
The bill would let federal retirees make multiple age-based and post-separation withdrawals from the Thrift Savings Plan. Under current law, participants in federal service can make only one withdrawal from the TSP upon reaching age 59-and-a-half. TSP participants who have left federal service can also withdraw a portion of their account balance only once.
In addition to more withdrawal options, the legislation would let TSP participants:
Revise the timing and amounts of periodic payments,
Give them the option of combining partial withdrawals or taking an annuity with periodic payments, and
Eliminate automatic annuities as the default option if participants don’t elect an alternative.
The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, the agency that administers the TSP, said at its last monthly board meeting it was pleased the bill quickly received both House and Senate support. But the board was unsure whether the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee would be able to quickly schedule a markup.
Cash bonuses for cost-savings
The committee will also consider a bill that expands an agency’s authority to hand out cash bonuses to employees who disclose waste, fraud and abuse, or simply areas where the organization could save money.
“The head of agency may pay a cash award to any employee of such agency whose identification of unnecessary expenses to the Chief Financial Officer of the agency has resulted in cost savings for the agency,” the legislation said.
However, the bill also expands the number of employees who would be ineligible to receive bonuses. Agency heads, employees serving at level one of the Executive Schedule, employees and officials in the Office of the Inspector General and commissioners, board members or other voting members of an independent board or organization could not receive a cash bonus.
The legislation, which Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.) introduced, comes as the Trump administration places a heavier focus on cutting duplicative processes and finding new ways to unearth cost savings, waste, fraud and abuse.
Limits on political appointees
Some members are attempting to codify into law an idea that President Donald Trump himself spoke of in the early days of his presidency.
Reps. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) and Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) introduced the legislation in February, shortly after Trump signed an executive order prohibiting political appointees from engaging in lobbying activities for up to five years after their departure in government.
Federal employee viewpoint surveys
Meadows introduced legislation that ensures the Office of Personnel Management will continue to conduct and administer annual employee surveys.
The legislation would require OPM write all the questions that apply to all federal employees, but surveys should also include questions specific to individual agencies.
The bill essentially codifies the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, which OPM has conducted annually for the past several years. But the legislation prevents OPM from making significant changes to the survey without first submitting regulations to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee for review.
Meadows, who introduced this bill, and other lawmakers had previously expressed concern with OPM’s recent plans to change the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey.
OPM issued a final rule at the end of 2016 describing the changes it will make to the 2018 FEVS. The survey will be shorter than previous versions, requiring 16 questions instead of 45.
The bill requires that OPM and agencies make the survey results public on their websites. It asks OPM to organize survey data by occupation.
Reports should include the average length of time it takes to complete initial investigations and periodic reinvestigations at the secret and top secret levels.
The reports are similar to what the Obama administration provided on the topic in quarterly updates on Performance.gov, which is no longer active but should be updated with new information and agency goals in February 2018, a message on the website reads.
The Office of Personnel Management struggled to bring wait-times down for security clearance reviews and periodic reinvestigations as it transitioned the functions of the Federal Investigative Services to the NBIB last fiscal year.
The clearance review process has also slowed since OPM took its Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (e-QIP) system offline following a major cyber breach in 2015.
NBIB had 304,617 cases awaiting a secret clearance, 69,927 pending approval for a top secret clearance and 175,683 awaiting a periodic reinvestigation in September 2016, according to the most recent public data available.
Public pension legislation
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) wants to make retirement information for retired federal employees subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
The Taxpayer Funded Pension Disclosure Act is not on the oversight committee’s agenda Wednesday, where DeSantis is also a member.
“Americans should know exactly how their taxpayer dollars are used to fund the pensions of members of Congress and other federal bureaucrats,” he said in a July 12 release. “The Taxpayer Funded Pension Disclosure Act will empower taxpayers to hold their government accountable and demand that their hard-earned tax dollars are spent wisely.”
The bill has support from five co-sponsors, including former House oversight committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).
Some lawmakers appear to have an interest in federal employee pension information, particularly in situations where an employee is accused of poor performance or misconduct. Congress, for example, has considered legislation that would revoke a senior executive’s pension if he or she retires or resigns before an agency can take an official disciplinary action.